Peer Reviewed Open Access

This paper is reviewed in accordance with the Peer Review Program of IRA Academico Research


The Ethical Dilemma in The Mill on the Floss: The Struggle between ‘Antigone’ and ‘Creon’

Tao Li, Yuan Sihan
Abstract
George Eliot views Antigone as a microcosm of social ethics, reflecting the clash between individuals and established rules. In The Mill on the Floss, Maggie, a mortal “Antigone,” struggles against the “established laws” embodied by her brother Tom, ultimately sacrificing herself for family interests. While Creon and Antigone represent a choice between human and divine law, Tom and Maggie symbolize tradition versus freedom. Through Maggie, Eliot highlights the triple ethical dilemmas faced by Victorian women. This paper, based on ethical criticism, reveals three key findings: First, Maggie faces a familial ethical dilemma between conforming to traditional female roles and pursuing self-realization. Second, she experiences a social ethical dilemma between maintaining family status and personal emotional choices, causing ethical anxiety. Third, the moral ethical dilemma between traditional morals and romantic pursuit forces Maggie to compromise, leading to her tragic end. Under Victorian moral standards, mortal “Antigones” clash with the “angel in the house” ideal, becoming victims of these triple ethical dilemmas.
Keywords
George Eliot; Ethical criticism; The Mill on the Floss; Antigone
Full Text:
PDF
References

Ablow, R. (2007). The marriage of minds: Reading sympathy in the Victorian marriage plot. University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442692022

Blake, K. (2005). Between economies in The Mill on the Floss: Loans versus gifts, or, auditing Mr. Tulliver’s accounts. Victorian Literature and Culture, 33(1), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1060150305001124

Byatt, A. S. (1980). Interview with Juliet Dusinberre. In J. Dusinberre (Ed.), Women writers talking. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/dusin5076

Eliot, G. (2003). The works of George Eliot. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1443824026

Eliot, G. (2003). The Mill on the Floss. Penguin Classics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0141439624

Fessenbecker, P. (2018). Sympathy, vocation, and moral deliberation in George Eliot. ELH, 85 (2), 501–532. https://doi.org/10.1353/elh.2018.0018

Guth, B. (1983). The tragedy of The Mill on the Floss. Studies in the Novel, 15(4), 356-363.

Han, Z. (2014). Antigone: The Resistance of Naked Life: On Žižek’s Ideological Interpretation of Antigone. Marxism and Reality, 1.

Hobsbawm, E. J. (1971). From social history to the history of society. Daedalus, 100 (1), 20–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/20023990

Han, H., & Zhou, L. (2022). On Ethical Choices in Antigone. Sichuan Drama.2022(03).

Kiesel, C. (2014). The Mill on the Floss’s Tom Tulliver and the Victorian Bluebeard type. Victorian Review, 40(1), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1353/vcr.2014.0010

Lacan, J. (2006). Écrits (B. Fink, Trans.). W. W. Norton & Company. (Original work published 1966)

Long, J., & Jia, Y. (2024). Family community construction from the perspective of ethics. Zhongzhou Academic Journal, 5.

Loesberg, J. (2019). Aesthetics, ethics, and unreadable acts in George Eliot. In Knowing the past (pp. 121-148). Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 978-1-4214-2895-3

Moldstad, D. (1970). The Mill on the Floss and Antigone. PMLA, 85(3), 527–531. https://doi.org/10.2307/1261433

Nie, Z. (2014). The introductory theory of ethical literary criticism. Peking University Press. ISBN 978-7-301-12345-6

Ruskin, J. (2012). Praeterita. Oxford University Press.

Spillman, D. S. (2017). “All that is solid turns into steam”: Sublimation and sympathy in George Eliot's The Mill on the Floss. Nineteenth-Century Literature, 72(3), 338-337. https://doi.org/10.1525/ncl.2017.72.3.338

Wang, Y. (2019). From “Antigone” to “Higne”: The “use”of literature in psychoanalytic ethics. Studies in Foreign Literature, 41(2).

Wu, Q. (2003). Virginia Woolf’s feminism. Journal of PLA Foreign Language University, 6.



©IRA Academico Research & its authors
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. This article can be used for non-commercial purposes. Mentioning of the publication source is mandatory while referring this article in any future works.